The Labor Force data for December 2016 (seasonally adjusted; California preliminary) is shown below, along with the change from the prior month:
|Dec 2016||Change from Nov 2016||Dec 2016||Change from Nov 2016|
The related not seasonally adjusted numbers (California preliminary), with the change from December 2015:
|Not Seasonally Adjusted||California||US|
|Dec 2016||Change from Dec 2015||Dec 2016||Change from Dec 2015|
California Employment Development Department’s (EDD) latest release shows on a seasonally adjusted basis, total employment dropped 39,000 from November, while the number of unemployed declined by 29,000. Most of the movement in the unemployment rate came as the labor force went down by 68,000.
California’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate continued easing to 5.2%. California tied with Washington for the 11th highest unemployment rate among the states. The unadjusted rate dropped from 5.7% in December 2015 to 5.0%.
Total US employment saw a seasonally adjusted increase of 63,000 from November, while the number of unemployed increased by 120,000. The national unemployment rate rose 0.1 points to 4.7%.
California’s participation rate (seasonally adjusted) dropped to 62.5% in December, while the US rate rose marginally by 0.1 point to 62.7%. The California participation rate still remains near the previous lows from 1976, and well below the average pre-recession level of 65.6% in 2007.
|Rank||Number of Employed||Percentage Change||Population Adjusted
(employment growth per 1,000 civilian
|1||CA 499,000||OR 4.9%||OR 28.6|
|2||TX 278,800||TN 4.8%||ND 28.5|
|3||FL 225,300||GA 4.4%||TN 26.9|
|4||GA 199,400||KY 4.3%||GA 25.5|
|5||NC 154,400||AZ 4.2%||CO 24.5|
|6||TN 139,600||ND 4.2%||WA 24.1|
|7||WA 136,700||WA 4.1%||UT 24.1|
|8||AZ 125,000||CO 3.8%||AZ 23.5|
|9||MI 115,000||UT 3.7%||KY 22.9|
|10||MA 112,900||NC 3.4%||MA 20.4|
|11||CO 104,700||MA 3.3%||NC 19.7|
|12||OR 92,800||SC 3.3%||HI 19.2|
|13||KY 79,000||ME 3.2%||ME 19.0|
|14||SC 69,900||HI 3.2%||SC 18.2|
|15||IN 64,500||CA 2.8%||DC 17.4|
|16||MD 63,000||AL 2.8%||CA 16.3|
|17||AL 55,400||DC 2.7%||MI 14.6|
|18||UT 52,300||MI 2.5%||AL 14.5|
|19||IL 45,000||FL 2.4%||NH 14.4|
|20||WI 42,400||TX 2.2%||FL 13.7|
|21||VA 36,000||NH 2.2%||TX 13.5|
|22||CT 31,600||MD 2.1%||MD 13.3|
|23||HI 21,100||IN 2.1%||IN 12.5|
|24||ME 20,800||CT 1.8%||CT 11.0|
|25||NV 18,500||NM 1.6%||WI 9.3|
|US 2,081,000||US 1.4%||US 8.2|
Between December 2015 and December 2016, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data shows the total number of employed in California increased by 499,000 (seasonally adjusted), or 24.0% of the total net employment gains in this period for the US (17.0% of the total for those states showing positive employment gains in this period). Measured by percentage change in employment over the year, California dropped to 15th highest. Adjusted for population, California dropped to 16th.
EDD reported that between November and December 2016, seasonally adjusted nonfarm wage and salary jobs grew 3,700 in December. November's gains were revised down slightly to 12,900 from the previously reported gain of 13,600.
Looking at the not seasonally adjusted numbers, hiring saw increases in all but three industries over the year. The change in total payroll jobs from December 2015 saw the largest increases in Government (63,500), Health Care & Social Assistance (54,700), and Professional, Scientific & Technical Services (46,500). Declines were in Manufacturing (-7,300), Mining & Logging (-2,200), and Administrative & Support & Waste Management Services (-1,600).
|Not Seasonally Adjusted Payroll Jobs||Nov 2016||Dec 2016||Change Dec 2016 - Nov 2016||Change Dec 2016 - Dec 2015|
|Mining & Logging||25,000||24,500||-500||-2,800|
|Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities||586,100||593,900||7,800||16,100|
|Finance & Insurance||532,400||536,400||4,000||5,400|
|Real Estate & Rental & Leasing||282,600||285,100||2,500||9,300|
|Professional, Scientific & Technical Services||1,273,100||1,277,700||4,600||46,500|
|Management of Companies & Enterprises||234,400||235,300||900||3,300|
|Administrative & Support & Waste Services||1,110,900||1,099,500||-11,400||-1,600|
|Health Care & Social Assistance||2,212,000||2,214,100||2,100||54,700|
|Individual & Family Services||598,700||601,900||3,200||12,700|
|Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation||303,000||308,100||5,100||12,400|
|Accommodation & Food Service||1,600,400||1,605,300||4,900||44,900|
|Total Wage & Salary||17,155,700||17,106,300||-49,400||344,300|
By total number of new jobs, California had the highest increase in seasonally adjusted nonfarm jobs among the states from December 2015 to December 2016, at 332,500 or 15.4% of the US net increase. By percentage growth in jobs, California dropped to 11th highest, and by population adjusted jobs growth, rose to 13th highest.
|Rank||Number of Jobs||Employment Growth (%)||Population Adjusted
(job growth per 1,000 civilian
|1||CA 332,500||OR 3.3%||DC 30.8|
|2||FL 251,400||FL 3.1%||OR 18.0|
|3||TX 210,200||WA 3.0%||UT 17.6|
|4||NY 114,700||NV 3.0%||WA 16.9|
|5||GA 103,300||UT 2.8%||NV 16.5|
|6||WA 97,400||GA 2.4%||FL 15.0|
|7||NC 85,200||MO 2.3%||MA 13.5|
|8||MA 75,000||DC 2.3%||MO 13.5|
|9||MI 75,000||MA 2.1%||GA 13.0|
|10||MO 64,500||HI 2.1%||HI 11.9|
|11||OR 59,400||CA 2.0%||CO 11.2|
|12||VA 49,600||NC 2.0%||NC 10.7|
|13||CO 48,800||ID 1.9%||CA 10.7|
|14||TN 48,300||CO 1.9%||NH 10.5|
|15||MN 43,600||TX 1.8%||ID 10.4|
|16||OH 41,800||MI 1.7%||MN 10.1|
|17||UT 39,000||NH 1.7%||TX 9.9|
|18||NV 38,300||SC 1.7%||MI 9.5|
|19||AZ 35,400||TN 1.6%||SD 9.3|
|20||SC 34,900||MN 1.5%||TN 9.2|
|US 2,157,000||US 1.5%||US 8.5|
Comparing the number of jobs by industry in December 2016 (not seasonally adjusted), 5 industries had employment below the 2007 pre-recession levels. In the highest gain industries, Health Care & Social Assistance (less IFS) remained the leading industry, followed by the two lowest wage industries (Accommodation & Food Services and Individual & Family Services) and higher wage Professional, Scientific & Technical Services. Of the lagging industries, three—Manufacturing, Mining & Logging, and Construction—are blue collar middle class wage industries, while the higher wage Finance & Insurance also continued to lose ground.
Unemployment rates (all data is not seasonally adjusted) continue to vary widely across the state, ranging from 3.5% in the Bay Area to nearly three times as large at 9.5% in the Central Valley.
|Not Seasonally Adjusted||Unemployment Rate (%) December 2016|
Containing just under 20% of the state’s population, the Bay Area was responsible for 45.2% of the net growth in employment since the pre-recession peak in 2007. Los Angeles Region, remaining in third place behind Inland Empire, has only 15.6% of net employment gains and just under 30% of the total population.
By Legislative District:
|Lowest 10 Unemployment Rates|
|CD12 (Pelosi-D)||2.8||SD13 (Hill-D)||2.6||AD16 (Baker-R)||2.5|
|CD45 (Walters-R)||2.8||SD11 (Wiener-D)||3.0||AD22 (Mullin-D)||2.5|
|CD18 (Eshoo-D)||2.9||SD37 (Moorlach-R)||3.0||AD24 (Berman-D)||2.7|
|CD52 (Peters-D)||3.0||SD39 (Atkins-D)||3.3||AD28 (Low-D)||2.8|
|CD14 (Speier-D)||3.0||SD36 (Bates-R)||3.3||AD74 (Harper-R)||3.0|
|CD17 (Khanna-D)||3.1||SD26 (Allen-D)||3.5||AD17 (Chiu-D)||3.0|
|CD33 (Lieu-D)||3.3||SD15 (Beall-D)||3.5||AD77 (Maienschein-R)||3.0|
|CD48 (Rohrabacher-R)||3.4||SD07 (Glazer-D)||3.6||AD73 (Brough-R)||3.0|
|CD49 (Issa-R)||3.5||SD10 (Wieckowski-D)||3.6||AD19 (Ting-D)||3.0|
|CD39 (Royce-R)||3.5||SD29 (Newman-D)||3.8||AD68 (Choi-R)||3.1|
|Highest 10 Unemployment Rates|
|CD44 (Barragán-D)||6.5||SD33 (Lara-D)||5.5||AD03 (Gallagher-R)||8.0|
|CD03 (Garamendi-D)||6.7||SD35 (Bradford-D)||5.7||AD34 (Fong-R)||8.1|
|CD09 (McNerney-D)||7.3||SD17 (Monning-D)||5.9||AD30 (Caballero-D)||8.1|
|CD10 (Denham-R)||7.8||SD04 (Nielsen-R)||6.5||AD23 (Patterson-R)||8.5|
|CD23 (McCarthy-R)||8.6||SD05 (Galgiani-D)||7.8||AD13 (Eggman-D)||8.6|
|CD20 (Panetta-D)||8.7||SD08 (Berryhill-R)||7.9||AD21 (Gray-D)||10.5|
|CD22 (Nunes-R)||9.3||SD40 (Hueso-D)||8.1||AD31 (Arambula-D)||10.8|
|CD51 (Vargas-D)||9.6||SD16 (Fuller-R)||8.5||AD56 (Garcia-D)||10.9|
|CD16 (Costa-D)||10.8||SD12 (Cannella-R)||9.9||AD26 (Mathis-R)||11.2|
|CD21 (Valadao-R)||11.4||SD14 (Vidak-R)||12.3||AD32 (Salas-D)||11.9|
Of the 10 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) with the worst unemployment rates nationally, 8 are in California. Of the 20 worst, 10 are in California.
|US Rank||MSA||November 2016 Unemployment Rate|
|378||Yuba City, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||8.8|
|379||Madera, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||9.0|
|380||Bakersfield, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||9.2|
|381||Fresno, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||9.3|
|381||Hanford-Corcoran, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||9.3|
|383||Merced, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||9.5|
|384||Ocean City, NJ Metropolitan Statistical Area||10.5|
|385||Visalia-Porterville, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||10.8|
|386||Yuma, AZ Metropolitan Statistical Area||16.7|
|387||El Centro, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area||20.3|
In his recently released Budget Proposal, the Governor highlighted the current pattern of jobs growth as one of the key factors behind the projected slowing revenues:
Much of the employment growth since the budget signing has come from workers newly entering or reentering the labor force. Combined with the recent increases in the minimum wage, this means a greater share of wages is now going to lower‑income workers. For example, over the last four years, the percentage of wage and salary growth from high‑wage sectors dropped from 50 percent to 36 percent of total growth. From an income distribution standpoint, this is a positive development. From a revenue standpoint, however, this is negative due to California’s progressive tax structure.
Analysis of the updated jobs data shows how this two-tier wage trend is playing out on the district level. Two comparisons are shown in the following tables: (1) the shorter term annual job change from 2015:Q1 to 2016:Q1 and (2) the longer term shift in the local jobs structure that has occurred, comparing the pre-recession levels in 2007:Q1 to 2016:Q1.
Looking at the annual changes between 2015:Q1 to 2016:Q1:
The longer term trends showing the structural changes from just prior to the recession fully illustrate the shift identified in the Governor’s Proposed Budget:
As always, additional district data, including the Congressional District data, is available in the Employment Data Tool section of the Center’s web site.
Note: All data sources, methodologies, and historical data series available at CenterforJobs.org.