01/26/2026

Reports » Job Reports

Full November 2025 Jobs Report

Download Report

The Center for Jobs and the Economy has released our full analysis of the November Employment Report from the California Employment Development Department. For additional information and data about the California economy visit www.centerforjobs.org/ca.

Highlights for policy makers:

Budget Economic Projections: US Up, California Down

While the budget surplus/deficit outcome is determined largely by stock market performance and capital gains, the core budget revenues including corporation income tax, sales and use tax, and fees are tied more to the state’s economic performance. Department of Finance consequently updates economic projections prior to the Proposed Budget and May Revise.

In the case of the US, the Finance numbers expect higher growth compared to last year’s May Revise. Projected jobs are higher, unemployment rate largely stable rather than expanding, and real GDP rising by about 2% annually, largely in line with other projections although more current indicators are suggesting higher growth in 2025:Q2 and 2026:Q1.

The California numbers are lower. The all budget-important personal income numbers still show about 1% real growth in 2026 and slightly higher in 2027, but the absolute estimates are little changed from the May Revise. Nonfarm jobs and unemployment shift from marginal improvement to a continuation of the stagnation the state has seen in the past two years with nonfarm jobs showing a small decline.

In both cases, the inflation prognosis shows improvement, due to a strong contribution from dropping world oil prices. California’s cost of living is still expected to rise faster than for the US as a whole.

Comparing Department of Finance Economic Projections
2025 Budget BillProposed BudgetChange
202520262027202520262027202520262027
US<br /> <br /> <br />
Real GDP, $ bil$23,619.5$23,969.0$24,339.4$23,821.5$24,356.0$24,800.3$202.0$387.0$460.9
159,414,000159,352,000159,390,000159,437,000160,225,000161,018,00023,000873,0001,628,000
Nonfarm Jobs00000023,00000
Unemployment Rate4.4%4.9%5.1%4.2%4.5%4.5%-0.1%-0.4%-0.6%
CPI-U3.5%3.0%2.5%2.8%2.9%2.6%-0.6%-0.1%0.2%
CA
Personal Income, $ bil$3,505.7$3,650.8$3,820.1$3,579.7$3,726.2$3,900.9$74.0$75.4$80.8
Nonfarm Jobs18,012,00018,057,00018,120,00017,957,00017,963,00018,006,000-55,000-94,000-114,000
Unemployment Rate5.4%5.5%5.5%5.4%5.6%5.5%0.0%0.1%0.0%
CPI-U3.8%3.5%3.1%3.2%3.3%3.2%-0.6%-0.3%0.1%

The composition of the job projections also points to the growing weakness of the state economy and its growing dependence on government spending at the expense of growing jobs in other sectors. As we have tracked in our monthly reports, jobs in the forecast window are sustained even at stagnant levels only through government spending on healthcare, social services, and government itself. The other private industries across the board are expected to show only marginal change or continue to shrink while growing in other states. In total, government, health care, and social services are expected to expand—along with the public revenues needed to support them—by 467,000. All other private industries combined show a further net contraction of 117,000.

The current tendency to focus on tax hikes to maintain and in some cases expand state expenditures misses the economic point entirely. Core private sector industries are already contracting under the onslaught of California’s regulations, taxes and fees, and costs of doing business and for their employees, costs of living. The disturbing trends in Finance’s numbers strongly suggest greater attention instead needs to be paid on what reforms are needed to keep and expand a more sustainable jobs base.

Unemployment Remains Above 1 Million

With the state once again posting the highest unemployment rate among the states at 5.5% (seasonally adjusted) in November, total unemployment has remained above 1 million since January 2024. The November unemployment level is 31% higher than in December 2018.

Unemployment rates (not seasonally adjusted) were higher in all regions compared to pre-pandemic February 2020 levels other than the Central Coast, Upstate California, and Central Valley. All regions other than Orange Country posted rates that were higher the overall unadjusted rate of 4.2% for all the other states.

Unemployment Rate by Region

Source:  EDD, not seasonally adjusted

Nov-25Feb-20
California5.44.3
Orange County4.12.8
Bay Area4.42.7
Sacramento5.03.7
San Diego/Imperial5.33.8
Inland Empire5.43.9
Central Sierra5.64.5
Los Angeles5.64.3
Central Coast5.97.0
Upstate California6.26.3
Central Valley7.88.4

Counties with Double-Digit Unemployment

The number of counties with an unemployment rate (not seasonally adjusted) at 10% or higher notched up to 3. The unadjusted rates ranged from 3.8% in San Mateo to 20.0% in Imperial. In the chart, counties with unemployment rates higher than the state average are coded in red.

Unemployment Rate by Legislative District

The estimated unemployment rates (not seasonally adjusted) are shown below for the highest and lowest districts. The full data and methodology are available on the Center’s website.

LowestCD40 Kim (R)3.7SD40 Jones (R)3.7AD76 Maienschein (D)3.5CD40 Kim (R)3.7
CD50 Peters (D)3.7SD13 Becker (D)3.8AD19 Ting (D)3.5CD50 Peters (D)3.7
CD11 Pelosi (D)3.9SD38 Blakespear (D)3.9AD23 Berman (D)3.6CD11 Pelosi (D)3.9
CD15 Mullin (D)4.0SD11 Wiener (D)3.9AD16 Bauer-Kahan (D)3.7CD15 Mullin (D)4.0
CD16 Eshoo (D)4.0SD37 Min (D)4.0AD72 Dixon (R)3.7CD16 Eshoo (D)4.0
CD47 Porter (D)4.0SD10 Wahab (D)4.3AD26 Low (D)3.8CD47 Porter (D)4.0
CD49 Levin (D)4.1SD34 Umberg (D)4.3AD68 Valencia (D)3.9CD49 Levin (D)4.1
CD10 DeSaulnier (D)4.1SD36 Nguyen (R)4.4AD21 Papan (D)4.0CD10 DeSaulnier (D)4.1
CD17 Khanna (D)4.2SD15 Cortese (D)4.4AD77 Boerner Horvath (D)4.1CD17 Khanna (D)4.2
CD14 Swalwell (D)4.3SD09 Skinner (D)4.6AD78 Ward (D)4.1CD14 Swalwell (D)4.3
HighestCD46 Correa (D)6.4SD01 Dahle (R)6.0AD60 Jackson (D)6.6CD46 Correa (D)6.4
CD03 Kiley (R)6.4SD04 Alvarado-Gil (D)6.1AD61 McKinnor (D)6.7CD03 Kiley (R)6.4
CD02 Huffman (D)6.5SD12 Grove (R)6.1AD22 Alanis (R)6.9CD02 Huffman (D)6.5
CD28 Chu (D)6.7SD23 Ochoa Bogh (R)6.1AD39 Carrillo (D)7.2CD28 Chu (D)6.7
CD48 Issa (R)7.0SD26 Durazo (D)6.1AD57 Jones-Sawyer (D)7.9CD48 Issa (R)7.0
CD24 Carbajal (D)7.1SD28 Smallwood-Cuevas (D)6.6AD35 Bains (D)8.7CD24 Carbajal (D)7.1
CD45 Steel (R)8.7SD35 Bradford (D)6.7AD27 Soria (D)9.0CD45 Steel (R)8.7
CD51 Jacobs (D)9.2SD18 Padilla (D)8.6AD31 Arambula (D)10.0CD51 Jacobs (D)9.2
CD35 Torres (D)9.6SD14 Caballero (D)9.6AD33 Mathis (R)10.6CD35 Torres (D)9.6
CD33 Aguilar (D)9.9SD16 Hurtado (D)9.9AD36 Garcia (D)11.0CD33 Aguilar (D)9.9

Youth Employment Continues to Erode

As we have discussed in the past, one of the most effective tools to combat income inequality is early employment opportunities for youths. The early development of workplace skills has been consistently shown in the literature to lead to higher lifetime wages and earnings.

California is closing this window of opportunity. As shown in the chart below, youth employment (age 14-18) has generally been in decline since the first part of the century, but primarily due to economic cycles. Youths experienced more significant cuts during the Great Recession, and after a gradual recovery trend again saw a steep drop during the pandemic. They then along with other job seekers experienced a surge during the labor shortage period immediately following the state’s reopening. Following enactment of AB 1228 increasing the fast food minimum wage to $20 an hour, jobs for this age group again have gone into a steep decline. Compared to the peak in 2023, jobs for this age group are down by just over one-fifth.

This trend is also reflected in the unemployment rates for this age group. Using a 12-month average from the Current Population Survey microdata (October survey was not conducted due to the federal closures), Youth unemployment is running about 5 times higher than the overall California average.

Youth Unemployment. December 2025
Source:  CPS, 12-month average
TotalMaleFemale
Total 14-1827.5%31.2%24.4%
....
Latino26.0%..
White, NL30.7%..
Asian-PI, NL21.2%..
Black, NL40.1%..

Unemployment Insurance

California employers—both private and government—previously faced the possibility that the federal employment tax rate—which comes on top of the state tax—would jump from its 2025 level of 1.5% to 5.2%. This potential increase stemmed from the initial determination that the state was subject to the “Benefit Cost Rate (BCR) Reduction” due to its persistent failure to pay off its substantial and growing unemployment insurance fund debt. The Department of Labor, however, subsequently approved the state’s waiver request. As a result, the federal tax rate increased to 2.1% in 2026 compared to 0.6% in the other states. In total, EDD expects that California employers will pay an additional $1.6 billion in federal taxes for 2026, rising to $2.0 billion in 2027.

With New York paying off its substantial debt this summer, California is now the only state carrying a debt from the pandemic period. Almost all the other states instead paid off their debts using federal assistance funds allowing for this specific use. While other states have restored the health of their funds, California’s debt in sharp contrast has continued to grow by $2.0 billion since the end of 2021. EDD’s latest projections expect the debt to grow even further by another $0.5 billion in 2026. The state budget is also affected due to the substantial interest payments, pegged by the governor’s Proposed Budget at $622 million in 2026.

Current UI claims show little prospect for change. Reflecting the extent to which the California jobs situation has remained stagnant and unemployment high over the past two years, initial claims continue to largely track the 2024 and 2025 trends.

Insured unemployment, a proxy for continuing claims, ended 2025 trending slightly below the previous years.

Reliance of California workers remains substantially higher than in the other states, with initial claims running at about 20% of the national total compared to the state’s 11% share of total wage and salary workers.

CaliFormers: Updated Moves

Additional CaliFormer companies identified since our last report are shown below. The listed companies include those that have announced: (1) moving their headquarters or full operations out of state, (2) moving business units out of state (generally back office operations where the employees do not have to be in a more costly California location to do their jobs), (3) California companies that expanding out of state rather than locate those facilities here, and (4) companies turning to permanent telework options, leaving it to their employees to decide where to work and live. The list is not exhaustive but is drawn from a monthly search of sources in key cities.

COMPANIESFROMTOREASONSOURCEYEAR
Advanced Pressure TechnologyNapaIndianaCompany moveLink2025
Anheuser-BuschFairfieldvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Anthony InternationalSylmarvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Applied MaterialsSanta ClaraArizona$270 million chip research centerLink2025
Astera CorporationBerkeleyTexasExpansionLink2025
bioMérieuxSan JosevariousClosureLink2025
Bionova ScientificFremontTexasManufacturing expansionLink2025
Building Materials Manufacturing (GAF)ShaftervariousManufacturing closureLink2025
CastellionEl SegundoNew MexicoManufacturing expansionLink2025
Celestica Precision Machining LtdFremontvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Cell Margue CorporationRocklinvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
ClearCaptionsRoseville<br /> Company moveLink2025
Coreweave & PoolsideBay AreaTexas2 GW data centerLink2025
Dart ContainerCoronavariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Dollar Shave ClubLos AngelesNorth CarolinaHQ moveLink2025
EquinixRedwoodTexas$835 million data centerLink2025
Fannie MaeSan FranciscoAlabamaRelocationLink2025
FoxconnSan JoseKentuckyManufacturing expansionLink2025
GAF EnergySan JoseTexasHQ moveLink2025
International PaperComptonvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
IntuitiveSunnyvaleGeogiaManufacturing expansionLink2025
J&J Snack FoodsColtonvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
KrackenSan FranciscoWyomingHQ moveLink2025
Leprino FoodsLemooreTexasManufacturing moveLink2025
Manna BeveragesWest Sacramento/AnaheimvariousPlant closuresLink2025
NetradyneSan DiegoTennesseeExpansionLink2025
Northrup GrumanSan JosevariousManufacturing closureLink2025
NovartisCarlsbadNorth Carolina$280 million manufacturing facilityLink2025
Open AISan FranciscoTexas, New Mexico, Ohio, Wisconsin$400 billion data centersLink2025
Pacific FusionFremontNew Mexico$1 billion manufacturing expansionLink2025
PegratronSanta ClaraTexasManufacturing expansionLink2025
Perseus DefenseSan FranciscoTexasHQ moveLink2025
RC PackingGonzalesvariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Related CompaniesLos Angeles & San FranciscoMichigan$7 billion data centerLink2025
Roseburg Forest Product Co Weed VeneerWeedOregonManufacturing closureLink2025
SenseiSanta MonicaTexasProduction expansionLink2025
Smurfit WestRockSan DiegovariousManufacturing closureLink2025
Swift Beef CompanyRiversidevariousManufacturing closureLink2025
X-SiliconSan DiegoArizonaHQ moveLink2025