News

The Democratic governor gave his usual rally cry in this coastal Chinese city, imploring the packed ballroom to help reinforce a global commitment to climate change. But a more specific theme also emerged, an undercurrent in his five-night trip that he’s echoed in several meetings with officials: Brown is looking to China for the future of California’s electric vehicles. The state aims to put 4 million to 5 million electric cars on roads by 2030, he said at the event, “and we aren’t going to get there until Chinese business people, Chinese government leaders make it a priority to develop batteries and electric cars. And we will too.”

Homebuilding was down across Southern California in the first three months of 2017, but nowhere more than San Diego County, said a Real Estate Research Council report released Monday.

Residential building permits were down by 10 percent in the seven-county region compared to the same time last year and 37 percent in San Diego County.

An environmental policy so broad, costly and complex that it fails under its own weight will mean lost jobs, a suffering economy and losing our position as a global climate policy leader. A smart cap-and-trade system will support farmers, dairymen, shift workers at the refineries and average Californians who want clean air.

Using a statewide carbon market with tools like offsets and free allowances for exposed businesses will increase compliance, reduce emissions and ensure that people stay employed in California’s backbone industries, such as manufacturing, construction and farming. These measures contain the cost to consumers and businesses to allow the market to reduce emissions over time. Cost containment, allowance price stability and continued legislative oversight will work together to ensure the program’s long-term efficacy and success.

There are many important issues that the legislature will continue working on this summer, including a myriad of bills to address our housing crisis, an extension of Cap and Trade and an L.A. Area Chamber-sponsored bill that would create an Emergency Child Care Bridge Program for foster children. But as is the case every year, there are many bills that California just doesn’t need.

Efficient carbon-price trajectories begin with a strong price signal in the present and a credible commitment to maintain prices high enough in the future to deliver the required changes. Relatively high prices today may be more effective in driving the needed changes and may not require large future increases, but they may also impose higher, short-term adjustment costs. In the medium to long term, explicit price trajectories may need to be adjusted based on the experience with technology development and the responsiveness to policy. The policy dynamics should be designed to both induce learning and elicit a response to new knowledge and lessons learned. Price adjustment processes should be transparent to reduce the degree of policy uncertainty.

A combination of policies is likely to be more dynamically efficient and attractive than a single policy. These policies could include investing in public transportation infrastructure and urban planning; laying the groundwork for renewable-based power generation; introducing or raising efficiency standards, adapting city design, and land and forest management; investing in relevant R&D initiatives; and developing financial devices to reduce the risk-weighted capital costs of low-carbon technologies and projects. Adopting other cost-effective policies can mean that a given emission reduction may be induced with lower carbon prices than if those policies were absent.

Based on federal government data, past reports, and contemporary studies, this report highlights regulatory compliance and economic impacts of federal intervention of $1.9 trillion annually. . . . If it were a country, U.S. regulation would be the world’s seventh-largest economy, ranking behind India and ahead of Italy.

If one assumed that all costs of federal regulation and intervention flowed all the way down to households, U.S. households would “pay” $14,809 annually on average in a regulatory hidden tax. That amounts to 21 percent of the average income of $69,629 and 26.45 percent of the expenditure budget of $55,978. The “tax” exceeds every item in the budget except housing.

When the Bay Area’s Metropolitan Transportation Commission decrees that 82 percent of all new housing in the region should be multi-family apartments—and that its climate policies will be paid for via a new regional tax of $1.75 per gallon of gas—it should acknowledge who will bear the greatest burden. (We can guess: low-income workers, mostly people of color, commuting from outside the region.)

When the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research proposes to intentionally increase road congestion to make commutes longer—and force more people to use transit—it should also tell us which workers and employers will be most impacted. (Pretty much all of us, since less than 10 percent of jobs, even in our dense coastal areas, can be accessed within an hour via transit.) When advocates for extending and reinventing cap-and-trade make similarly expansive climate proposals—calling for doubling or tripling the cost of carbon or for applying new carbon taxes on all products imported into the state—they should be required to explain how these new measures will impact prices. (Our best estimate: by increasing the cost of pretty much everything.)

Regulations: A new study confirms what most people would take as a given — that smaller cars are less safe than bigger cars. So why is the federal government trying to force people into smaller, less-safe vehicles? The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports that of the 10 cars with the highest death rates over model years 2012-2015, eight are either small or minicars. On the other hand, of the 10 cars with the lowest death rates, four were large and five were midsize. The other was a Toyota pickup.

Sales in Denmark of Electrically Chargeable Vehicles (ECV), which include plug-in hybrids, plunged 60.5 percent in the first quarter of the year, compared with the first three months of 2016, according to latest data from the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA). That contrasts with an increase of nearly 80 percent in neighboring Sweden and an average rise of 30 percent in the European Union. The figures suggest clean-energy vehicles still aren’t attractive enough to compete without some form of subsidy.

IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute was commissioned by the Transport Department and the Swedish Energy Agency investigated the lithium-ion battery climate impact seen from a life cycle perspective. It’s the batteries intended for electric cars that were included in the study. The two authors Lisbeth Dahllöf and Mia Roman has done a meta-study, that is to say, gone through and compiled existing studies. The report shows that battery production leads to high emissions. For every kilowatt hour of storage capacity in the battery creates emissions of 150 to 200 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents, already at the factory. The scientists have not studied the individual car brands of batteries, how these particular produced or what electricity they use. But if we to an understanding of the importance of battery size takes an example: two common electric cars on the market, the Nissan Leaf and Tesla Model S, have batteries in about 30 kWh and 100 kWh.

What has been the biggest accomplishment of the Fight for $15 movement?

It’s reaffirmed a very bedrock principle of working people, which is when we join together, we can make the impossible, possible. This bodacious demand, four years ago, for $15 and a union—that people were laughing at, thought was crazy—the $15 part of that has become a standard against which people will debate. I have more people coming up to me than ever before and asking, “When is it going to $20? When are you upping the demand?”

For solar jobs, Hoffman references data reported by the solar power industry. I looked up and found the Solar Foundation paper Hoffman references. What Hoffman defines as “workers” who are “employed” by the U.S. solar industry are actually defined by the Solar Foundation as jobs which the solar industry “supports.” The Solar Foundation liberally defines jobs “supported” by the solar power industry as to include every component on the solar industry chain, plus additional jobs like lawyers, lobbyists, public relations professionals, government employees overseeing the solar power industry, permitting officers, plumbers, electricians, salesmen, land acquisition specialists, and financiers.

The 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento rejected that argument. The decision has caused new consternation at the chamber, which said in its appeal that the court risks “putting no limits on what money can be exacted and providing a road map for the evasion of Proposition 13’s limits” on increasing taxes.

E10 fuel (90% gasoline/10% ethanol) has a source energy, which is reduced due to extraction, processing and transport, to become the primary energy fed to E10 vehicles. As a result, the energy fed to the tank has to be multiplied by 1.2639 to obtain source energy.

Electrical energy has a source energy, which is reduced due to extraction, processing and transport, to become the primary energy fed to power plants, which convert that energy into electricity, which after various losses, arrives at use meters. As a result, the energy fed to the meter has to be multiplied by 2.995 to obtain source energy.

The below “40 mpg, EPA combined” table shows, high-mileage E10 vehicles, including hybrids, such as the 52 mpg Toyota Prius, have greater energy efficiency than EVs, and only slightly greater CO2 emissions than EVs. It would be much less costly and quicker to significantly increase the US hybrid fleet, than to build out the EV fleet, which is still in its infancy, and would require major, expensive changes to supporting infrastructures.

AB 5, authored by Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez-Fletcher (D-San Diego) and Assemblymember Ash Kalra (D-San Jose) prohibits California businesses with as few as 10 employees from hiring part-time help until those work hours have been offered to existing employees. Under this bill, if a company has offices in Northern and Southern California and the office in Irvine has a growing workload and needs to hire

Under this bill, if a company has offices in Northern and Southern California and the office in Irvine has a growing workload and needs to hire extra help they would be precluded from doing so until the extra hours were offered to existing employees in Lodi. Yes, this is an actual bill and two Legislators put their names on it.